FaceySarah
16 September, 2011
Originally Posted By gillmania

gillmania:

On Zooey Deschanel:
I would like to preface this by saying that, yes, Zooey Deschanel is typecasted and a little vanilla and portrays a version of a child-like woman to mass audiences. I would also like to preface this by saying I have not seen her TV show and I do not own a TV, so I won’t be seeing it anytime soon. 
People seem to be annoyed with Zooey Deschanel and her floral prints and her singing, but think about the typecasts of other women in movies, television and the media in general. It has become clear to everyone with half of a brain that advertising and women’s roles in the media have gotten raunchier, less intelligent and more sexed-up than ever. Ali Lohan got a new alien face, Snookie is a celebrity and you can’t become the star of a big box office hit like Transformers or Spiderman without being able to fit into a size 0 and be … well … an actual model. 
Sure, Zooey Deschanel isn’t the perfect stereotype of a woman, but she does real things that real people do. She listens to records. She wears clothing that covers up most of her body. She’s silly. She may be so cute that it’s annoying, but I’ve never seen a Zooey Deschanel nip slip or sex tape. 
I know a number of women who are fighting to change our stereotype in the media that are at the same time bashing Zooey Deschanel for being too cutesy. We can’t expect people to change their opinions about tanned skin, women’s bodies on display and plastic surgery without having women in the media who embody the opposite. I honestly think Zooey Deschanel does a good job of that. 
We should be lifting up, celebrating and supporting female characters who can be strong and silly and in charge of their own lives. Sure, her roles portray her as just another indie girl, but the more indie girls and less unrealistic Barbie types there are out there, the better we will be.

Amen, Gillman.

gillmania:

On Zooey Deschanel:

I would like to preface this by saying that, yes, Zooey Deschanel is typecasted and a little vanilla and portrays a version of a child-like woman to mass audiences. I would also like to preface this by saying I have not seen her TV show and I do not own a TV, so I won’t be seeing it anytime soon. 

People seem to be annoyed with Zooey Deschanel and her floral prints and her singing, but think about the typecasts of other women in movies, television and the media in general. It has become clear to everyone with half of a brain that advertising and women’s roles in the media have gotten raunchier, less intelligent and more sexed-up than ever. Ali Lohan got a new alien face, Snookie is a celebrity and you can’t become the star of a big box office hit like Transformers or Spiderman without being able to fit into a size 0 and be … well … an actual model. 

Sure, Zooey Deschanel isn’t the perfect stereotype of a woman, but she does real things that real people do. She listens to records. She wears clothing that covers up most of her body. She’s silly. She may be so cute that it’s annoying, but I’ve never seen a Zooey Deschanel nip slip or sex tape. 

I know a number of women who are fighting to change our stereotype in the media that are at the same time bashing Zooey Deschanel for being too cutesy. We can’t expect people to change their opinions about tanned skin, women’s bodies on display and plastic surgery without having women in the media who embody the opposite. I honestly think Zooey Deschanel does a good job of that. 

We should be lifting up, celebrating and supporting female characters who can be strong and silly and in charge of their own lives. Sure, her roles portray her as just another indie girl, but the more indie girls and less unrealistic Barbie types there are out there, the better we will be.

Amen, Gillman.

Comments
18 August, 2011
Originally Posted By sserene

(via medonner)

Comments
15 August, 2011
Originally Posted By veronicahhh

I’m constantly 1-2 issues behind reading this entire magazine. This issue arrived last week. Since this is a two week issue, I finally caught up. Does anyone else have this problem? Or am I just slow busy?

I’m constantly 1-2 issues behind reading this entire magazine. This issue arrived last week. Since this is a two week issue, I finally caught up. Does anyone else have this problem? Or am I just slow busy?

(Source: veronicahhh)

Comments
5 months ago
Originally Posted By cest-comme-la-mode

cest-comme-la-mode:

Girls on Bikes/ 3.1 Phillip Lim Fall 2011 Collection

  • 3.1 Phillip Lim
  • video
  • FAll 2011
Comments
5 months ago
Originally Posted By gillmania

Stream Stephin Merritt's new album here

(Source: gillmania)

Comments
12 August, 2011
Originally Posted By isobelgoestothecity

(via desert-boots)

Comments
11 August, 2011
Originally Posted By nellienellie

nellienellie:

Cats ‘n Things: Alles Voor. Over En Met Katten

nellienellie:

Cats ‘n Things: Alles Voor. Over En Met Katten

Comments
6 August, 2011
Originally Posted By veronicahhh

n Monday morning, August 21 1911, inside the Louvre museum in Paris, a plumber named Sauvet came upon an unidentified man stuck in front of a locked door. The man – wearing a white smock, like all the Louvre’s maintenance staff – pointed out to Sauvet that the doorknob was missing. The helpful Sauvet opened the door with his key and some pliers. The man walked out of the museum and into the Parisian heatwave. Hidden under his smock was Leonardo da Vinci’s “Mona Lisa”.

Who stole the Mona Lisa? - FT.com

(via veronicahhh)

Comments
30 July, 2011
Originally Posted By silverscents

silverscents:

Jeneil Williams by Ben Toms

silverscents:

Jeneil Williams by Ben Toms

(via desert-boots)

Comments
28 July, 2011
Originally Posted By yeahwriters

prettygirlsmakegraves:

Indeed they read.

prettygirlsmakegraves:

Indeed they read.

(via girlinlondon)

Comments
>
page 1 of 17

other news is designed by manasto jones, adjustments by FaceySarah,and powered by tumblr

home

about

archive

random

rss

email

LINKS

OTHER BLOG
TWITTER
ASK FormSpring